Development Services Committee

Minutes

-
Electronic Meeting
Present:
  • Councillor Marimpietri
  • Councillor McConkey
  • Councillor Chapman
  • Councillor Hurst
  • Councillor Kerr
  • Mayor Carter
Also Present:
  • Councillor Giberson
  • Councillor Gray
  • Councillor Neal
  • R. Rossetti, Council-Committee Coordinator
  • F. Bianchet, Council-Committee Coordinator
  • J. Lane, Council-Committee Coordinator
  • M. Medeiros, City Clerk
  • W. Munro, Commissioner, Development Services Department
  • T. Goodeve, Director, Planning Services
  • A. Ambra, Director, Engineering Services
  • M. Harrington, Manager, Policy
  • D. Sappleton, Manager, Development and Urban Design
  • S. Yoon, City Solicitor
  • A. Kosnick, Lawyer
  • S. Sinnott, Commissioner, Finance Services
  • R. Gill, Transportation Engineer
  • S. Wilcox, Manager, Oshawa Municipal Airport
  • R. Bedic, Principal Planner

  • Moved byCouncillor McConkey

    That the delegations of Greg LeBlanc, Ken Roberts, Ron Bremner, Bill Forbes, Ken Ruffo, Vera Lo, Melanie Thornton, Anita Singh and Peter Lawryshyn be added to the agenda and, that Correspondence DS-22-68 from Wesley Anderson submitting comments concerning Report DS-22-51, Correspondence DS-22-69 Brad Bryant submitting comments concerning Reports DS-22-64 and DS-22-67, and Correspondence DS-22-70 from Various Residents submitting comments concerning Report DS-22-65 be added to the Development Services Committee meeting of March 7, 2022 and referred to the respective reports.

    Motion Carried
  • Moved byCouncillor McConkey

    That the delegations of Greg LeBlanc, Ken Roberts, Ron Bremner, Bill Forbes and Ken Ruffo be heard. 

    Motion Carried
  • Moved byCouncillor McConkey

    That the delegations of Vera Lo, Melanie Thornton, Anita Singh and Peter Lawryshyn be heard in closed session.

    Motion Carried

Greg LeBlanc addressed the Development Services Committee concerning the proposed noise abatement procedures for the Oshawa Executive Airport.

  • Moved byCouncillor McConkey

    That the delegation's time be extended by 2 minutes. 

    Motion Carried
  • The Committee questioned Greg LeBlanc.

    Motion

Ken Roberts addressed the Development Services Committee concerning the Results of Staff Investigation regarding a Water Drainage Issue at 903 Black Cherry Drive.

The Committee questioned Ken Roberts.

  • Moved byMayor Carter

    That the order of the agenda be altered to bring forward the delegation of Ken Ruffo before Bill Forbes. (Requires 2/3 majority) 

    Motion Carried

Ron Bremner addressed the Development Services Committee concerning the Results of Legal Opinion and Peer Review of Transportation Matters Related to the Site Approval Application for 1231 Ormond Drive.

The Committee questioned Ron Bremner.

Ken Ruffo addressed the Development Services Committee concerning the proposed noise abatement procedures for the Oshawa Executive Airport.

The Committee questioned Ken Ruffo. 

  • Councillor Marimpietri declared a conflict on this item. (As he has family members who own property within the subject area and did not take part in discussion or voting on the matter.)

Councillor McConkey assumed the Chair.

Bill Forbes addressed the Development Services Committee regarding the Correspondence DS-21-232 concerning the decision of the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks regarding 1515 Thornton Road North and Bill Forbes submitting correspondence concerning 5052 Harmony Road North and 1515 Thornton Road North (Evergreen Environmental).

The Committee questioned Bill Forbes.

  • Councillor Marimpietri declared a conflict on this item. (As he has family members who own property within the subject area and did not take part in discussion or voting on the matter.)
  • Moved byCouncillor Chapman

    That Correspondence DS-22-46 concerning 5052 Harmony Road North and 1515 Thornton Road North (Evergreen Environmental) be referred to Report DS-22-62.

    Motion Carried

Councillor Marimpietri resumed the Chair.

  • Moved byCouncillor Chapman

    That the meeting recess.

    Motion Carried
  • The Committee recessed at 4:56 p.m. and reconvened at 6:00 p.m. with all members of the Development Services Committee in attendance electronically.

    Motion
  • Moved byMayor Carter

    That the Development Services Committee recommend to City Council:

    Whereas, on February 8, 2022, a “Report of the Ontario Housing Affordability Task Force” was released publicly and presented to the Honourable Steve Clark, Ontario Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing; and,

    Whereas, the Ontario Housing Affordability Task Force was formed by the provincial government and tasked with the goal of formulating a number of actionable and concrete solutions to address the housing affordability and supply crisis in Ontario; and,

    Whereas, the report contains a number of recommendations aimed to address housing affordability for Ontarians, and sets an ambitious target of 1.5 million new homes to be built in Ontario in the next ten years; and,

    Whereas, several of the recommendations in the report, if implemented, would result in reduced decision-making powers for municipalities when it comes to identifying and planning for appropriate residential intensification within their respective communities, as well as result in fewer opportunities for public consultation and input in the local development approval process; and,

    Whereas, while it is acknowledged that Ontario is in the midst of a housing crisis and all levels of government need to identify opportunities to increase the supply of housing to meet community needs, it is also essential to respect local decision-making and the democratic process to ensure that housing is appropriately planned at a local level and through a public process;

    Therefore be it resolved that:

    1. City Council supports the need to increase the supply of housing within the Province of Ontario and within the City of Oshawa, where appropriately planned at a local municipal level and advanced through a public process that involves City Council in the decision-making process; and,
    2. City Council opposes those recommendations of the Ontario Housing Affordability Task Force related to such matters as limiting appeal rights, reducing public participation, limiting decision-making at the local municipal level, limiting heritage preservation efforts, reducing or eliminating minimum parking requirements, removing barriers to construction that may compromise health and safety, limiting fiscal responsibility by requiring mandatory development charge and cash in lieu of parkland exemptions and permitting increased density as-of-right without local review of appropriate locations, servicing capacities and zoning by-law standards for intensification; and,
    3. Mayor Carter, on behalf of City Council, be authorized to send a letter to the Premier of the Province of Ontario and the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing to express the City’s concerns, as generally noted in this resolution, with respect to those recommendations of the “Report of the Ontario Housing Affordability Task Force” which seek to limit public input and local decision-making power by municipalities concerning residential intensification in their respective communities; and,
    4. Development Services staff report through the Development Services Committee on any subsequent recommendations or legislative changes being advanced by the Province with respect to this matter when posted on the Environmental Bill of Rights or released publicly; and,
    5. A copy of this Council resolution be sent to the Region of Durham, Durham area municipalities, Durham area M.P.P.s, the Association of Municipalities of Ontario and Ontario’s Big City Mayors.
    Affirmative (6)Mayor Carter, Councillor Chapman, Councillor Hurst, Councillor Kerr, Councillor Marimpietri, and Councillor McConkey
    Motion Carried (6 to 0)
  • Moved byMayor Carter

    That the Development Services Committee recommend to City Council:

    Whereas, SO Developments Inc. (the “Developer”) has submitted rezoning and draft plan of subdivision applications (Files: Z-2016-15 and S-O-2016-11, respectively) to permit a residential subdivision featuring a number of single detached dwelling and semi-detached dwelling lots on the west side of Park Road South, south of Renaissance Drive and adjacent to the Lake Ontario Waterfront and the City’s Waterfront Trail; and,

    Whereas, the Developer appealed the applications to the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal (which is now referred to as the Ontario Land Tribunal – “O.L.T.”), with the appeal case number being PL180364; and,

    Whereas, the City has consistently opposed these applications primarily on the basis of protecting the majority of this property as an environmental protection area for wildlife, specifically the monarch butterfly migratory habitat located on the lands given that the monarch is a Species at Risk, and for future generations given the property’s location adjacent to the waterfront; and,

    Whereas, the Lake Ontario waterfront is an important asset in the City and the City has been an advocate for protecting lands along the waterfront for environmental protection purposes and for ensuring a more publicly accessible waterfront; and,

    Whereas, City protection of lands for public purposes along the waterfront include examples such as the Second Marsh which is a Provincially Significant Wetland, the Gold Point Wildlife Reserve and the Ed Broadbent Waterfront Park; and,

    Whereas, the City retained environmental experts to provide evidence at the O.L.T. hearing on the Developer’s applications in order to protect the monarch butterfly migratory habitat; and,

    Whereas, the O.L.T. did not accept the City’s evidence and vision for this property and made a decision to effectively allow the entirety of the property to be developed, which demonstrated in Council’s opinion that the private developer interests outweighed the considerations of the public interest; and,

    Whereas, this O.L.T. decision is disappointing as the City believes the O.L.T. should have given more weight and consideration to the City’s evidence and position which represented the community’s voice for the waterfront on behalf of all the City’s residents; and,

    Whereas, if the recommendations of the Ontario Task Force on Housing Affordability are implemented by the Government of Ontario then the local positions and voices of municipalities and their residents will be further marginalized and disregarded since private interests concerning housing developments would appear to take precedence over other higher order public interests such as environmental protection along the waterfront;

    Therefore be it resolved:

    1. That Mayor Carter on behalf of City Council send a letter to the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing and the Minister of Northern Development, Mines, Natural Resources and Forestry advising of the City’s disappointment with respect to the Ontario Land Tribunal’s decision concerning the proposed subdivision on the west side of Park Road South, south of Renaissance Drive and adjacent to Lake Ontario and the City’s Waterfront Trail, and requesting changes to the planning approval process to give considerably more weight to local municipal council positions in the public interest since council is more aware of the needs and vision of the local community; and,
    2. That a copy of this resolution be sent to the Region of Durham, all local municipalities in the Region of Durham, all Durham MPPs, the Association of Municipalities of Ontario and the Ontario Big City Mayors.
    Affirmative (6)Mayor Carter, Councillor Chapman, Councillor Hurst, Councillor Kerr, Councillor Marimpietri, and Councillor McConkey
    Motion Carried (6 to 0)
  • Councillor McConkey declared a conflict on this item. (As she has family members who own property within the subject area and did not take part in discussion or voting on the matter.)
  • Moved byMayor Carter

    That the Development Services Committee recommend to City Council:

    Whereas, A Place to Grow: Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe, 2020 (the “Growth Plan”) provides population and employment forecasts for all upper and single-tier municipalities in the Greater Golden Horseshoe to plan and manage growth and guide land use decision-making to 2051; and,

    Whereas, the Growth Plan has a minimum density target of fifty (50) residents and jobs combined per hectare for new development in the Region of Durham’s designated Greenfield areas; and,

    Whereas, aside from general open space areas, the lands within the Columbus Part II Planning Area are designated in the Durham Regional Official Plan and Oshawa Official Plan as Living Areas and Residential, respectively, and constitute a Greenfield area in accordance with the Growth Plan; and,

    Whereas, the Columbus Part II Planning Area is a unique Greenfield area in Oshawa in that it contains the former hamlet of Columbus, including the existing main intersection at Columbus Road and Simcoe Street North and the approaches along Simcoe Street North and Columbus Road leading to the main intersection, commonly referred to as the Columbus Special Development Area; and,

    Whereas, the former hamlet of Columbus forms the core of the Columbus Part II Planning Area and contains several identified and potential cultural heritage resources that date back to the nineteenth century; and,

    Whereas, the Oshawa Official Plan contains policies to ensure that future growth within the former hamlet of Columbus occurs in a manner that is sensitive to the community’s cultural heritage, considering land use compatibility, scale of development and urban design; and,

    Whereas, the community of Columbus, while unique to Oshawa, is contextually similar in terms of its built heritage resources and character to that which is found in similar, once rural, settlements across the Greater Golden Horseshoe that have subsequently become part of a municipality’s designated Greenfield area; and,

    Whereas, given the existing built form and lotting fabric of many former rural settlements across the Greater Golden Horseshoe that are now within designated Greenfield areas, it is challenging to achieve the minimum density target for residents and jobs in designated Greenfield areas required under the Growth Plan while still protecting the character and built heritage resources of such settlements; and,

    Whereas, the City of Oshawa, like other lower-tier municipalities throughout the Greater Golden Horseshoe, is obligated to comply with the Growth Plan’s minimum density target for designated Greenfield areas regardless of the challenges associated with preserving the existing built heritage resources and character of former rural settlements; and,

    Whereas, the Draft Preferred Land Use and Road Plan developed for the Integrated Columbus Part II Planning Act and Municipal Class Environmental Assessment Act Study currently underway in Oshawa achieves the requisite minimum density target of fifty (50) residents and jobs combined per hectare overall, but only through implementing a greater number of higher-density land uses surrounding the former hamlet in order to offset the substantially lower density level of the former hamlet area itself, whose character and built form it is desirable to protect;

    Therefore, be it resolved:

    1. That Mayor Carter on behalf of Council be authorized to send a letter to the Premier of the Province of Ontario requesting that the Province amend A Place to Grow: Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe, 2020, to allow lower-tier municipalities to implement lower minimum density targets in terms of combined jobs and population in designated Greenfield areas where preservation of the existing characteristics of a former rural settlement, such as the former hamlet of Columbus, is desirable, and to allow the City to exclude the former hamlet area for the purposes of calculating the population density targets in the Growth Plan; and,
    2. That a copy of this Council resolution be sent to the Region of Durham, Durham area municipalities, Durham area MPPs, and the Association of Municipalities of Ontario.
    Affirmative (5)Mayor Carter, Councillor Chapman, Councillor Hurst, Councillor Kerr, and Councillor Marimpietri
    Absent (1)Councillor McConkey
    Motion Carried (5 to 0)
  • Moved byCouncillor McConkey

    Whereas there is little conformity between Schedules for the Urban Growth Centre, outlined in Schedules D, E, G, and I of the Zoning By-law Number 60-94 as Amended;

    Now therefore staff investigate the benefits of providing more conformity with regards to the boundaries of the Oshawa Urban Growth Centre and the arbitrary nature of some of the current mapping boundaries.

    Affirmative (2)Councillor Kerr, and Councillor McConkey
    Negative (4)Mayor Carter, Councillor Chapman, Councillor Hurst, and Councillor Marimpietri
    Motion Lost (2 to 4)
  • Moved byCouncillor McConkey

    That the Development Services Committee recommend to City Council:

    That Report DS-22-54 being the First Report of Heritage Oshawa be endorsed:

    1. 827 Gordon Street Designation Request (HTG-22-11)

    Whereas at its meeting of May 10, 2021 the Development Services Committee referred Correspondence DS-21-102 from AnnMarie Snider and Correspondence DS-21-103 from David Talbot concerning 827 Gordon Street to Heritage Oshawa; and,

    Whereas at its meeting of May 26, 2021, Heritage Oshawa considered Correspondence HTG-21-28 (DS-21-102) and HTG-21-29 (DS-21-103) and commissioned a research report for 827 Gordon Street; and,

    Whereas at its meeting of November 25, 2021, Heritage Oshawa considered a research report for 827 Gordon Street and received the report for information;

    Therefore, be it resolved:

    1. That 827 Gordon Street not be designated (under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act) at this time; and,
    2. That AnnMarie Snider and David Talbot be thanked for their correspondence and interest in heritage research and heritage designation.
    Motion Carried
  • Moved byCouncillor Kerr

    That Report DS-22-55 being the Second Report of Heritage Oshawa be endorsed:

    1. Ontario Heritage Designation Plaques (HTG-22-13)

    Whereas Oshawa City Council has approved the designation of a number of properties since 2019; and,

    Whereas the City protocol is to have a City of Oshawa, Ontario Heritage Designation plaque ceremony at newly designated property; and,

    Whereas there currently have not been public events to allow these plaque ceremonies to take place;

    That staff report back on the number of properties that do not have a City of Oshawa, Ontario Heritage Designation plaque and if there is a policy in place to provide the plaques directly to the property owner without a ceremony taking place.

    Motion
  • Moved byCouncillor Chapman

    That Report DS-22-55 being the Second Report of Heritage Oshawa be referred to staff for a direct response.

    Motion Carried
  • Moved byCouncillor McConkey

    That all items listed under the heading of Public Consent Agenda for the March 7, 2022 Development Services Committee meeting be adopted as recommended, except Reports DS-22-51, DS-22-58, DS-22-60, DS-22-62, DS-22-64, DS-22-65, DS-22-66, DS-22-67.

    Motion Carried
  • That Correspondence DS-22-63 from Erik Tamm, owner of Oshawa Markets submitting a request for the retroactive approval of the work and investment made to the Oshawa Markets be referred to staff for a report.

    Motion
  • That the Development Services Committee recommend to City Council:

    1. That Report DS-22-52 dated March 2, 2022 regarding the Update on the Lviv Boulevard Design and Ministry of Transportation's Rehabilitation of Highway 401 and Replacement of Bridge Structures Contracts be endorsed as the City’s comments; and,
    2. That a copy of Report DS-22-52 be forwarded to the Ministry of Transportation and the Regional Municipality of Durham.
    Motion
  • That the Development Services Committee recommend to City Council:

    That, pursuant to Report DS-22-61 dated March 2, 2022, the Development Services Department be authorized to schedule a statutory public meeting under the Planning Act to consider an amendment to the Oshawa Official Plan as outlined in Section 5.3 of said Report concerning the potential delegation of authority to City staff for the passing of by-laws to remove holding symbols.

    Motion
  • Moved byCouncillor McConkey

    That based on Report DS-22-51, the City reduce the height of the small berm at the rear of the property at 903 Black Cherry Dr.

    Affirmative (2)Mayor Carter, and Councillor McConkey
    Negative (4)Councillor Chapman, Councillor Hurst, Councillor Kerr, and Councillor Marimpietri
    Motion Lost (2 to 4)
  • Moved byCouncillor Chapman

    That the Development Services Committee recommend to City Council:

    That Report DS-22-51 dated March 2, 2022 concerning a drainage issue at 903 Black Cherry Drive be received for information.

    Motion Carried
  • Moved byCouncillor McConkey

    That the Development Services Committee recommend to City Council:

    That Report DS-22-60, dated March 1, 2022 being the Development Services Committee’s Outstanding Items Status Report for the first quarter of 2022 be received for information.

    Motion Carried
  • Councillor Marimpietri declared a conflict on this item. (As he has family members who own property within the subject area and did not take part in discussion or voting on the matter.)

Councillor Hurst assumed the Chair. 

  • Moved byCouncillor McConkey

    That the Development Services Committee recommend to City Council:

    1. That staff consult with the Durham Region works, transportation and planning committees' staff concerning the location, zoning, future development/planning, traffic (volume, safety, noise and air impacts) on municipal road conditions are under the municipal jurisdiction, in order to help formulate truck routes to and from 1515 Thornton Rd; and,
    2. That staff consult with the Oshawa Executive Airport, concerning the flue from AD stack and gas storage and Oshawa Fire Services regarding the gas storage to investigate if safety measures may be required.
    Motion
  • A request was made to divide the motion to vote on Parts 1 and 2 separately.

    The vote to adopt Part 1 of the motion concerning the decision of the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks regarding 151 Thornton Road North.

    Affirmative (1)Councillor McConkey
    Negative (4)Mayor Carter, Councillor Chapman, Councillor Hurst, and Councillor Kerr
    Conflict (1)Councillor Marimpietri
    Motion Lost (1 to 4)
  • The vote to adopt Part 2 of the motion concerning the decision of the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks regarding 151 Thornton Road North.

    Affirmative (1)Councillor McConkey
    Negative (4)Mayor Carter, Councillor Chapman, Councillor Hurst, and Councillor Kerr
    Conflict (1)Councillor Marimpietri
    Motion Lost (1 to 4)
  • Moved byCouncillor Chapman

    That the Development Services Committee recommend to City Council:

    That Report DS-22-62 dated March 2, 2022 concerning Correspondence DS-21-232 concerning the decision of the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks regarding 1515 Thornton Road North be received for information.

    Affirmative (4)Mayor Carter, Councillor Chapman, Councillor Hurst, and Councillor Kerr
    Negative (1)Councillor McConkey
    Absent (1)Councillor Marimpietri
    Motion Carried (4 to 1)
  • Councillor Chapman declared a conflict on this item. (As he is both a member in good standing of the Museum and an Honourary Colonel of the Ontario Regiment and did not take part in discussion or voting on the matter. ;)

Councillor Marimpietri resumed the Chair. 

  • Moved byCouncillor Hurst

    That the Development Services Committee recommend to City Council:

    1. That, pursuant to Report DS-22-64 dated March 2, 2022, the South Field and East Airport Accessible Trail lands as shown on Attachment 1 to said Report be deemed not necessary for the management, maintenance or operation of the Oshawa Executive Airport as an undertaking and as a result, Transport Canada be requested to amend the 1997 Operating and Option Agreement for the Oshawa Executive Airport to remove said lands from the area subject to the agreement; and,
    2. That, pursuant to Report DS-22-64 dated March 2, 2022, the Mayor and Clerk be authorized to sign any necessary agreement required to give effect to Item 1 above; and,
    3. That, pursuant to Report DS-22-64 dated March 2, 2022, staff be authorized, in consultation with the Airport Manager, to advance discussions with the appropriate representatives of the Federal Government with respect to various matters concerning the current framework and terms of the 1997 Operating and Option Agreement for the Oshawa Executive Airport, as generally outlined in Section 5.4 of said Report, and report back to the Development Services Committee on the results of those discussions.
    Affirmative (5)Mayor Carter, Councillor Hurst, Councillor Kerr, Councillor Marimpietri, and Councillor McConkey
    Conflict (1)Councillor Chapman
    Motion Carried (5 to 0)
  • Moved byCouncillor McConkey

    That Report DS-22-65 concerning the results of legal opinion and peer review of transportation matters related to the Site Plan Approval Application for 1231 Ormond Drive be deferred to a Special Development Services Committee Meeting to be held before the March 28, 2022, City Council meeting.

    Affirmative (1)Councillor McConkey
    Negative (5)Mayor Carter, Councillor Chapman, Councillor Hurst, Councillor Kerr, and Councillor Marimpietri
    Motion Lost (1 to 5)
  • Moved byCouncillor Kerr

    That the Development Services Committee recommend to City Council:

    That Report DS-22-65 dated March 2, 2022, concerning the results of a legal opinion and peer review of transportation matters related to the site plan approval application (File: SPA-2018-32) for 1231 Ormond Drive, be received for information.

    Affirmative (4)Mayor Carter, Councillor Chapman, Councillor Kerr, and Councillor Marimpietri
    Negative (2)Councillor Hurst, and Councillor McConkey
    Motion Carried (4 to 2)
  • Moved byCouncillor McConkey

    That the Development Services Committee recommend to City Council:

    Whereas, Spectra Venue Management (Spectra) manages the Tribute Communities Centre (T.C.C.) on behalf of the City of Oshawa; and,

    Whereas, on January 24, 2022, Spectra submitted correspondence (see Attachment 1) seeking to explore the possibility of removing the video sign board at 99 Athol Street East which is at the end of its life cycle and replacing it with a new High Definition LED video sign board in a new more visible location; and,

    Whereas, Spectra has identified the west façade of the Mary Street Parking Garage located at the northeast corner of King Street East and Mary Street North as an appropriate location for the new High Definition LED video sign board (see Attachment 1); and,

    Whereas, Spectra has clarified that the new High Definition LED video sign board would primarily advertise upcoming events such as Oshawa Generals games but would also include third party advertising for T.C.C. sponsor recognition (i.e. Tribute, Pizza Pizza, Coca-Cola); and,

    Whereas, Spectra has also clarified that the new High Definition LED video sign board would accommodate City of Oshawa public service announcements such as Program Registration or COVID-19 information; and,

    Whereas, both the T.C.C. and the Mary Street Parking Garage are owned by the Corporation of the City of Oshawa; and,

    Whereas, the Sign By-law 72-96, as amended, defines an Official Sign as any sign required by or erected on behalf of any federal, provincial, regional or municipal government or agency thereof or board or commission or public utility; and,

    Whereas, a new video sign board at the Mary Street Parking garage would be considered an Official Sign; and,

    Whereas, Article 3.5.1 of Sign By-law 72-96, as amended, permits the City to install an Official Sign on City property including projecting into a municipal road allowance; and,

    Whereas, Article 3.11.1 of Sign By-law 72-96, as amended, permits a read-of-graph to be incorporated into a display surface as part of a permitted sign area for a fascia sign; and,

    Whereas, the new High Definition LED video sign board proposed by Spectra is 6.09 metres (20 ft.) by 3.65 metres (14 ft.) (see Attachment 2); and,
    Whereas, Article 3.12 of Sign By-law 72-96, as amended, provides that none of the provisions of Bylaw 72-96, as amended, apply to prevent the erection or display of any Official Sign; and,

    Whereas, although Sign By-law 72-96, as amended, provides an exemption through Article 3.12.1, it is appropriate to seek Council direction on this matter owing to the third party advertising;

    Therefore, be it resolved that Spectra Venue Management be advised that the City consents to a new High Definition LED video sign board, approximately 6.09 metres (20 ft.) by 3.65 metres (14 ft.) in size as shown generally on Attachments 1 and 2 to be installed at the Mary Street Parking Garage.

    Motion Carried
  • Moved byCouncillor Kerr

    That the Development Services Committee recommend to City Council:

    1. That, pursuant to Report DS-22-67 dated March 2, 2022, Council adopt the Proposed Noise Abatement Procedures for the Oshawa Executive Airport for the purposes of authorizing the Airport Manager to submit the Council-adopted Proposed Noise Abatement Procedures for the Oshawa Executive Airport and all supporting material to Transport Canada for their review, consideration and final approval as outlined in said Report in accordance with Transport Canada’s Advisory Circular 302-002; and,
    2. That the Mayor be authorized to send a letter on behalf of City Council to the Federal Minister of Transport to advise of the City’s adoption of the Noise Abatement Procedures for the Oshawa Executive Airport and that the City looks forward to the Minister’s support; and,
    3. That copies of this Report and associated resolution be forwarded to all Oshawa and Whitby MPs and MPPs as well as to the Town of Whitby.
    Affirmative (6)Mayor Carter, Councillor Chapman, Councillor Hurst, Councillor Kerr, Councillor Marimpietri, and Councillor McConkey
    Motion Carried (6 to 0)
  • Moved byCouncillor Chapman

    That the Development Services Committee recommend to City Council:

    Whereas the City owns a park block in the new residential subdivision being developed by Treasure Hill located north of Shankel Road and west of Townline Road North; and,

    Whereas a number of streets in the existing subdivision located both north and south of Adelaide Avenue East in this area are name after General Motors vehicles such as Belair. Eldorado, Skylark and Lemans; and,

    Whereas it is important to recognize and celebrate the reopening of the General Motors plant and specifically the high quality new Silverado trucks being built at the plant; and,

    Whereas both General Motors and Unifor have no objection to naming this park as “Silverado Park” and recognize that the name was inspired by the GM Silverado being built in Oshawa; and,

    Whereas it is anticipated that the park will be constructed in 2022 and naming it after a GM vehicle is consistent with the naming of many streets in the area;

    Therefore be it resolved:

    1. That the new park located north of Shankel Road, west of Townline Road North be name “Silverado Park”; and
    2. That General Motors and Unifor be thanked for their support in naming the park after the Silverado trucks being built in Oshawa.
    Motion (5 to 1)
  • Amendment:
    Moved byCouncillor McConkey

    That the renaming of this Park be referred to the Diversity and Inclusion Committee.

    Affirmative (1)Councillor McConkey
    Negative (5)Mayor Carter, Councillor Chapman, Councillor Hurst, Councillor Kerr, and Councillor Marimpietri
    Motion Lost (1 to 5)
  • The vote to adopt the motion concerning the renaming of the new park located Shankel Road, west of Townline Road North.

    Affirmative (5)Mayor Carter, Councillor Chapman, Councillor Hurst, Councillor Kerr, and Councillor Marimpietri
    Negative (1)Councillor McConkey
    Motion Carried (5 to 1)
  • Moved byCouncillor McConkey

    That all items listed under the heading of Closed Consent Agenda for the March 7, 2022 Development Services Committee meeting be adopted as recommended.

    Motion Carried
  • That Correspondence DS-22-48 from the Region of Durham submitting a request for Right-of-Way Widening be referred to staff for a report.

    Motion
  • That the Development Services Committee recommend to City Council:

    That, pursuant to Report DS-22-44 dated March 2, 2022, City staff be authorized to advance the Council position as recommended in Section 5.2 of said Report at the Ontario Land Tribunal concerning an appeal submitted by Karen Hodgeman with respect to an Application to Amend Zoning By-law 60-94 (File: Z-2020-04) for the lands known municipally as 1040 Cedar Street and 280 Wentworth Street West.

    Motion
  • That pursuant to Closed Report DS-22-45 dated March 2, 2022, the Commissioner, Development Services Department be authorized to execute an appropriate agreement with Chung & Jao Development Corp. for the shared use of a City-owned parking lot located at the south end of the Ritson Fields Park at 1523 Ritson Road North, consistent with the terms and conditions contained in said Report and in a form and content satisfactory to the Commissioner, Development Services Department and City Solicitor.

    Motion
  • That, pursuant to Item DS-22-47 dated March 2, 2022, staff be authorized to execute an amendment to the Lease Agreement dated July 10, 2018 with Island Heritage Realty Inc. for the continued use of the expanded area of the office space in the Terminal, in accordance with Item DS-22-47 in a form and content to the satisfaction of the Commissioner, Development Services Department, the Airport Manager, and the City Solicitor.

    Motion
  • That the Development Services Committee recommend to City Council:

    That, pursuant to Closed report DS-22-49 dated March 2, 2022, the request for an amended encroachment agreement to permit a larger encroachment on a portion of City-owned land on the north side of Rossland Road West, west of Ansley Court be denied, as set out in Section 5.3.1 of said Report.

    Motion
  • That the Development Services Committee recommend to City Council:

    That, pursuant to Closed Report DS-22-50 dated March 2, 2022, the Commissioner, Development Services Department be directed to advance Option 1 as set out in Section 5.4.1 of said Report as the City’s response to the request for an encroachment or transfer of the City-owned land, located at the northwest corner of Eulalie Avenue and Huron Street, comprising 0 Eulalie Avenue.

    Motion
  • That the Development Services Committee recommend to City Council:

    That, pursuant to Closed Report DS-22-53 dated March 2, 2022, the request for an encroachment agreement to permit an encroachment on a portion of City-owned land on the south side of Valewood Court, east of Sandalwood Court be denied, as set out in Section 5.3.1 of said Report.

    Motion
  • Moved byCouncillor McConkey

    That the meeting recess for 5 minutes in order to shut down the web stream; and,
    That in accordance with Section 239(2)(c) of the Municipal Act, the meeting reconvene in a session closed to the public to hear delegations from Vera Lo, Melanie Thornton, Anita Singh and Peter Lawryshyn. 

    Motion Carried

The Committee recessed at 9:27 p.m. and reconvened at 9:34 p.m. in a session closed to the public with the following in attendance: Councillors Chapman, Hurst, Kerr, Marimpietri, McConkey and Mayor Carter. Also in attendance were R. Rossetti Council-Committee Coordinator; J. Lane, Council-Committee Coordinator; F. Bianchet, Council-Committee Coordinator; the City Clerk; the Commissioner, Development Services Department; and the Director, Planning Services.

All other staff and members of the public left the meeting.

Closed meeting discussions took place.

The Committee rose from closed session at 10:25 p.m.

The following is a summary of the closed portion of the meeting.

Vera Lo entered the meeting.

Vera Lo addressed the Development Services Committee concerning a request for an amended agreement to permit an encroachment south of Woodlea Crescent on City-owned Land on the north side of Rossland Road West, west of Ansley Court.

The Committee questioned Vera Lo.

Vera Lo left the meeting.

Melanie Thornton entered the meeting.

Melanie Thornton addressed the Development Services Committee concerning a request for an amended agreement to permit an encroachment south of Woodlea Crescent on City-owned Land on the north side of Rossland Road West, west of Ansley Court.

The Committee questioned Melanie Thornton.

Melanie Thornton left the meeting.

Anita Singh entered the meeting.

Anita Singh addressed the Development Services Committee concerning a request for an amended agreement to permit an encroachment south of Woodlea Crescent on City-owned Land on the north side of Rossland Road West, west of Ansley Court.

The Committee questioned Anita Singh.

Anita Singh left the meeting.

Peter Lawryshyn entered the meeting.

Peter Lawryshyn addressed the Development Services Committee concerning a request for an encroachment agreement to permit an encroachment on City-owned Land on the south side of Valewood Court, east of Sandalwood Court.

Peter Lawryshyn left the meeting.

This concludes the closed meeting report.

  • Moved byCouncillor Kerr

    That the Committee rise from closed session.

    Motion Carried
  • Moved byMayor Carter

    Therefore be it resolved that Development Services staff proceed as directed in Closed session concerning the surplus lands.

    Motion
  • Moved byCouncillor Kerr

    That the meeting recess for 5 minutes in order to shut down the web stream; and,

    That in accordance with Section 239(2)(c) of the Municipal Act, the meeting reconvene in a session closed to the public to consider the item introduced concerning direction regarding surplus lands. 

    Motion Carried

    Closed Meeting Report 2

    The Committee recessed at 10:29 p.m. and reconvened at 10:31 p.m. in a session closed to the public with the following in attendance: Councillors Chapman, Hurst, Kerr, Marimpietri, McConkey and Mayor Carter. Also in attendance were R. Rossetti Council-Committee Coordinator; J. Lane, Council-Committee Coordinator; F. Bianchet, Council-Committee Coordinator; the City Clerk; the Commissioner, Development Services Department; and the Director, Planning Services.

    All other staff and members of the public left the meeting.

    Closed meeting discussions took place.

    The Committee rose from closed session at 11:02 p.m.

    The following is a summary of the closed portion of the meeting.

    The Committee questioned the Commissioner, Development Services Department concerning Report DS-22-72 regarding Direction Regarding Surplus Lands.

    The Commissioner, Development Services Department responded to questions from the Committee.

    This concludes the closed meeting report.


  • Moved byMayor Carter

    That the Committee rise from closed session.

    Motion Carried
  • The vote to adopt the motion concerning the direction regarding surplus lands.

    Negative (6)Mayor Carter, Councillor Chapman, Councillor Hurst, Councillor Kerr, Councillor Marimpietri, and Councillor McConkey
    Motion Lost (0 to 6)
  • Moved byCouncillor Chapman

    That the meeting adjourn at 11:03 p.m.

    Motion Carried