Community and Operations Services

Committee Minutes

-
Council Chamber
Present:
  • Councillor Gray
  • Councillor Lee
  • Councillor Chapman
  • Councillor Neal
  • Councillor Nicholson
  • Mayor Carter
Also Present:
  • Councillor Kerr
  • Councillor Giberson
  • Councillor McConkey
  • R. Rossetti, Council-Committee Coordinator
  • L. Davis, Manager, Legislative Services/Deputy City Clerk
  • R. Diskey, Commissioner, Community and Operations Services Department
  • M. Saulnier, Director, Operations
  • B. Mullen, Director, Community Support Services
  • J. Naumovski, Director, Recreation Services
  • M. Sluggett, Manager, Traffic, Streetlighting and Parking
  • M. Whitbread, Manager, Operations Policy and Research
  • T. Benson, Senior Traffic Engineering Technologist

  • Moved byCouncillor Lee

    That the delegation of Robert Small be added to the Community and Operations Services Committee Meeting of May 15, 2023.

    Motion Carried

Michael Sluggett, Manager Traffic, Street Lighting and Parking and Tyler Benson, Senior Traffic Engineering Technologist provided a presentation concerning Report CO-23-28 regarding the Petition for Pedestrian Crossover on Coldstream Drive.

Members of the Committee questioned the Manager Traffic, Street Lighting and Parking and the Senior Traffic Engineering Technologist.

  • Moved byCouncillor Lee

    That the delegation of Robert Small be heard.

    Motion Carried

Robert Small addressed the Community and Operations Services Committee concerning Report CO-23-28 concerning a Petition for Pedestrian Crossover on Coldstream Drive near Bloom Senior Residence.

Members of the Committee questioned Robert Small.

  • Moved byCouncillor Lee

    That the Community Services Committee recommend to City Council:

    Whereas Correspondence CO-23-26 was received from Plazacomm Investments Ltd. (“Plazacomm Investments”) and reported to Council under Report CNCL-23-40 on May 1, 2023; and,

    Whereas Report CNCL-23-40 was referred back to the Community and Operations Services Committee; and,

    Whereas Plazacomm Investments has requested 200 parking spaces for long-term use in the adjacent City-owned parking structure located at 40 Bond Street West (“Centre Street Parking Garage”); and,

    Whereas City staff have advised Plazacomm Investments that the maximum number of parking spaces that can be offered at the Centre Street Parking Garage is 150, which Plazacomm Investments has accepted; and,

    Whereas 150 parking spaces being licensed out at the City's current monthly rate woudl result in monthly parking revenues of approximately $12,534 per month; 

    Therefore be it resolved that City Council authorize the Commissioner, Community and Operations Services to respond to Plazacomm Investment's request that the City of Oshawa shall provide a non-binding letter of commitment in providing a total of up to 150 parking spaces on a non-exclusive basis, conditionally only on Plazacomm Investment's purchase of the 8-storey office building located at 40 King Street West, City of Oshawa.

    Affirmative (5)Mayor Carter, Councillor Chapman, Councillor Gray, Councillor Nicholson, and Councillor Lee
    Negative (1)Councillor Neal
    Motion Carried (5 to 1)
  • Moved byCouncillor Chapman

    That the Community and Operations Services Committee recommend to City Council:

    That Report CO-23-32 being the OATAC Projects Working Group Report concerning the design of roundabouts be endorsed:

    That, based on Report CO-23-32 (formerly OATAC-23-06) staff implement the recommendations for updates to existing roundabouts.

    Motion Carried
  • Moved byCouncillor Lee

    That the Community and Operations Services Committee recommend to City Council:

    1. That Option 1 to not install a PXO at Bloom Senior Residence as detailed in Section 5.1 of Report CO-23-28 ‘Petition for Pedestrian Crossover on Coldstream Drive near Bloom Senior Residence’, dated May 10, 2023 be selected; and,
    2. That Pedestrian Warning signs with Seniors tabs be installed on Coldstream Drive in the vicinity of Bloom Senior Residence.
    Affirmative (5)Mayor Carter, Councillor Chapman, Councillor Gray, Councillor Nicholson, and Councillor Lee
    Negative (1)Councillor Neal
    Motion Carried (5 to 1)
  • Moved byCouncillor Chapman

    That the Community and Operations Services Committee recommend to City Council:

    That based on Report CO-23-30, Oshawa not participate in the Curbside Swap Day pilot.

    Affirmative (4)Mayor Carter, Councillor Chapman, Councillor Neal, and Councillor Lee
    Negative (2)Councillor Gray, and Councillor Nicholson
    Motion Carried (4 to 2)
  • Moved byCouncillor Nicholson

    That the Community and Operations Services Committee recommend to City Council:

    Whereas on May 16, 2022 Community Services Committee recommended Item CS-22- 48, being a Notice of Motion, to City Council:

    “Whereas the City of Oshawa has placed signage recognizing the historical hamlets of Raglan and Columbus; and,

    Whereas the historical hamlets in Oshawa represent a key feature of the development of our City and that legacy should not be lost; and,

    Whereas the historical hamlets of Cedar Dale, Southmead and Westmount have no recognition and their legacy is in danger of being lost;

    Therefore, that staff investigate and report back on the following:

        1. The feasibility of placing signage, similar to that provided for Raglan and Columbus, that will recognize the historical hamlets of Cedar Dale, Southmead and Westmount; and,
        2. Funding opportunities to support the construction and placement; and,
        3. Potential locations on public lands or city boulevard for such signs.”; and,

    Whereas at the May 24, 2022 meeting of Council, the Notice of Motion was referred to staff to consult with the Oshawa Historical Society for further comment; and,

    Whereas the Oshawa Historical Society Archivist provided a report as it relates to the proposed historical hamlets referenced in the Notice of Motion, provided as Attachment 1, but did not provide further comment related to signage; and,

    Whereas generally these types of requests are initiated through community interest in recognition of historical significance; and,

    Whereas since there is little known about the history of Westmount and Southmead or their boundaries; and,

    Whereas Westmount and Southmead were considered neighbourhoods as opposed to a hamlet or a village it is not feasible or appropriate to provide recognition; and,

    Whereas the Archivist noted that Cedar Dale was listed along with Columbus and Raglan as a principle village within the township of East Whitby with a defined boundary south of Bloor Street to Lake Ontario bounded by Park Road to the west and Wilson Road to the East, as shown in Attachment 2; and,

    Whereas the Village of Columbus and the Village of Raglan are uniquely different from historical villages located within the urban boundary;

    Whereas, staff reviewed the feasibility of recognizing the history of Cedar Dale as a village within the township of East Whitby and determined that accommodating road signs similar to the signs for Raglan and Columbus is not practical or feasible due to the size and space required within the right of way;

    Whereas, if based on the Archivists report, there is a desire to recognize the former Village of Cedar Dale, it would be more appropriate to include “Historic Village of Cedar Dale” on the primary neighbourhood park signage within the designated area, as shown in Attachment 3;

    Whereas, this would be over and above Parks Operations annual sign replacement program requiring additional Operating Budget of $14,500 plus staff resources;

    Therefore be it resolved that if, based on the Archivists report, there is a desire to recognize the former Village of Cedar Dale the following be endorsed:

    1. That, pursuant to Item CO-23-29, the former Village of Cedar Dale should be recognized as a historically significant area; and,
    2. That Operations Services staff be authorized to add “Historic Village of Cedar Dale” to the primary neighbourhood park signs within the area historically known as Cedar Dale; and,
    3. That an additional $14,500 be added to the 2024 Parks Operating budget for sign replacement.
    Motion Carried
  • Moved byCouncillor Neal

    That the meeting adjourn at 11:46 a.m.

No Item Selected